Lucien van der Walt in Michael Schmidt, 2014, “Proudhon, Marx in anarhistična družbena analiza”, Časopisa za kritiko znanosti, Časopis za kritiko znanosti (Casopis za kritiko znanosti)volume XLII, number 257,pp. 159-192.

pdflogosmall Get the PDF here

Slovenian abstractCROP COVER van der Walt, Schmidt - Proudhon, Marx in anarhisticna družbena analiza

Na šišjo anarhistično tradiciio sta močno vplivala tako Proudhon kot Marx, vendar ie anarhizem storil vse, da se izonede terminizmu, teleološkim pogledom na igodovino, ekdnomskemu redukcionizmu in funkcioalistični perspektivi, pišeta v pričujočem prevodu avtorja besedila. Ključni elementi anarhistične družbene analize so v besedilu podali shematsko. Anarhistična analiza v svoji najbolj sofisticirani obliki sloni na ideji, da je razred ključna značilnost sodobne družbe; zato mora biti razredna analiza kljurza razumevanje druibe. Obenem zelo resno bbranava ideje, motive in dejanja in zavrača monistične modele družbe. Z zavrnhijo ekonomskega determinizma in poudarjanjem pomena subjektivitete analiza ne nadomesti ene oblike determinizma z drugo.

Ključne besede: marksizem, anarhizem, razred, ekonomija, zgodovina, napredek, država

English abstract
“Proudhon, Marx and Anarchist Social Analysis”
Schmidt’s and van der Walt’s text is taken from their book “Black Flame”, which was published by AK Press in 2009. For the present edition of the “Journal for the Critique of Science”, third chapter was translated. The broad anarchist tradition was profoundlyinfluenced by both Proudon and Marx, but did its bestto eschew determinism, teleological views of history, economic reductionism, and functionalism. The key elements of an anarchist social analysis in the text have emerged in a schematic form. Anarchist analysis, in its most sophisticated form, centres on the notion that class is a principal feature of modern society and thus that class analysis must be key to understanding society. At the same time, it takes ideas, motives and actions seriously, and avoids monistic models of society. In rejecting economic determinism and stressing the importance of subjectivity, this analysis does not replace one form of determinism with another.

Keywords: maxism, anarchism, class, economics, history, progress, state

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s